July 16, 2008 6:42 PM in Arbitration • Bill Tracker • On The Hill | Bill Allen
On July 15, 2008, the House Subcommittee on Commercial and Administrative Law voted to report favorably the Arbitration Fairness Act of 2007 (H.R. 3010) to the full Judiciary Committee. H.R.3010 was introduced in the House by Rep. Hank Johnson (D-GA) on July 12, 2007, and the Subcommittee held hearings on the Act in October.
H.R.3010 would amend the Federal Arbitration Act by invalidating any pre-dispute arbitration agreement requiring mandatory arbitration of disputes under employment, consumer or franchise contracts, or any dispute arising under a statute “intended to protect civil rights or to regulate contracts or transactions between parties of unequal bargaining power.” The Act allows arbitration of disputes if both parties agree to use arbitration after a dispute arises and would not invalidate arbitration clauses in collective bargaining agreements.
Rep. Johnson stated that arbitration has become increasingly common in contracts between businesses and parties with less bargaining power, such as employees or consumers, and that arbitration clauses are often obscure and “buried” in such agreements. Rep. Johnson also noted that arbitration providers have a strong incentive to favor the business hiring them, creating a biased forum with little accountability or oversight.
Rep. Chris Cannon (R-Utah) criticized the Act as interfering with contract rights and also expressed concerns that eliminating arbitration would decrease the ability of employees to pursue small claims. Critics of the Act have echoed Rep. Cannon’s concerns, emphasizing that the Act may hurt the very parties it seeks to protect by slowing the dispute resolution process and raising litigation costs.
The Senate Version of H.R.3010, S.1782, was introduced by Sen. Feingold (D-WI) on July 12, 2007 and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary. H.R.3010 has 101 co-sponsors, while S.1782 has six co-sponsors.
March 23, 2008 4:07 PM in Arbitration • Bill Tracker | Bob Lian
Core Provisions: This extensive farm bill includes an anti-arbitration provision. Section 210 of the act would only permit arbitration to resolve controversies in livestock or poultry contracts where, after the dispute has arisen, the parties consent in writing to arbitration. It would render void pre-dispute arbitration provisions in these agreements.
Status: S.2302 was introduced in the Senate by Sen. Harkin (D-IA) on Nov. 2, 2007 and placed on the Senate Legislative Calendar. H.R.2419 was introduced in the House by Rep. Peterson (D-MN) on May 22, 2007. Different versions of the bill have passed each house and will be reconciled via conference committee. The Senate appointed conferees on February 4, 2008.
December 7, 2007 11:09 PM in Arbitration • Bill Tracker | Bob Lian
Core Provisions: This Act would amend the Federal Arbitration Act to invalidate any pre-dispute arbitration agreement requiring arbitration of an employment, consumer or franchise dispute, or any dispute arising under any statute “intended to protect civil rights or to regulate contracts or transactions between parties of unequal bargaining power.” The Act would apply to any dispute that arises after the legislation is enacted, regardless of the date of the pre-dispute arbitration agreement. The Act would not invalidate arbitration clauses in collective bargaining agreements. Congressional findings in H.R.3010 express concern that consumers and employees have few meaningful choices when they sign pre-dispute arbitration agreements, and that mandatory arbitration is becoming increasingly widespread despite possible arbitrator partiality, non-transparency, the lack of “meaningful” judicial review and unfair provisions in arbitration agreements.
Status: H.R.3010 was introduced in the House by Rep. Johnson (D-GA) on July 12, 2007 and hearings were held by the House Judiciary Subcommittee on Commercial and Administrative Law on October 25, 2007 (see Hearings on the Hill, Page 1). On July 15, 2008, the bill was reported out favorably to the full House Judiciary Committee. In the Senate, S.1782 was introduced by Sen. Feingold (D-WI) on July 12, 2007 and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary. H.R.3010 has 53 co-sponsors, while S.1782 has six co-sponsors.