Deprecated: Assigning the return value of new by reference is deprecated in /nfs/c02/h05/mnt/29876/domains/washlaborwire.com/html/wp-includes/cache.php on line 36

Deprecated: Assigning the return value of new by reference is deprecated in /nfs/c02/h05/mnt/29876/domains/washlaborwire.com/html/wp-includes/query.php on line 21

Deprecated: Assigning the return value of new by reference is deprecated in /nfs/c02/h05/mnt/29876/domains/washlaborwire.com/html/wp-includes/theme.php on line 540
Washington Labor & Employment Wire » NLRB to Sue Arizona, South Dakota Over Secret Ballot Amendments

NLRB to Sue Arizona, South Dakota Over Secret Ballot Amendments

On April 22, 2011, the NLRB announced that it would bring suit against Arizona and South Dakota to overturn state constitutional amendments banning the use of the card-check process in union elections. In November 2010, voters in Arizona, South Dakota, South Carolina, and Utah passed constitutional amendments requiring secret ballot elections in all union elections. Stating that the amendments are preempted by federal labor law, Acting General Counsel Lafe Solomon announced the upcoming lawsuits against Arizona and South Dakota, declining to bring suit against the latter two states at this time to conserve taxpayer dollars. Currently, federal labor law permits voluntary card check or majority sign-up arrangements as an alternative method to select a union where the union and the employer reach an agreement. Section 7 of the NLRA permits workers to choose a union through two pathways: NLRB-conducted secret-ballot elections and voluntary recognition after a showing of majority support through the use of the card-check or majority sign-up processes. The state constitutional amendments would eliminate the latter pathway to union certification, preventing employers from entering into neutrality agreements with unions utilizing the card-check or majority sign-up processes.  

The NLRB initially threatened legal action against Arizona, South Carolina, South Dakota, and Utah in January 2011. In January 2011 letters to the attorneys general of those four states, Solomon warned that the state amendments would pressure employers who previously agreed to voluntary recognition agreements to withdraw recognition from labor organizations representing their work forces and could lead to unnecessary litigation by workers challenging unions with majority support. In response, the state attorneys general asserted the legality of those amendments and pledged to defend them.  

The state amendments are an outgrowth of the defeat of the Democratic-sponsored Employee Free Choice Act in the 111th Congress, which would have permitted the use of the card-check or majority sign-up processes outside the voluntary recognition context.  This year, Senate Republicans have introduced the Secret Ballot Protection Act, a federal bill mirroring the state constitutional amendments that would ban the card-check/voluntary recognition pathway and require secret ballot elections in all circumstances. With Democrats controlling the Senate, the legislation is unlikely to have majority support in that body, let alone the 60 votes needed for cloture.

NLRB Acting General Counsel Solomon was nominated by President Obama earlier this year to a four-year term as General Counsel on a permanent basis. His nomination is currently pending in the Senate.